I hate Justin Timberlake

You want a rant??

ok then...

Justin Timberlake is my enemy. He couldn't keep his hormones in check during the superbowl a couple years back and had to undress Janet Jackson on live television! Now, while there were some people going crazy (The FCC and Boob fans) let me assure you, it wasn't worth it. I mean the FCC has cracked down on tv and radio like there's no tomorrow. The backlash includes Howard Stern moving to satellite radio (not that I'm a big fan, but i don't think his show needs to be that censored.) And other miscellanous shows cutting back on just about everything.
But where does it hurt the most??

The Superbowl halftime show. Honestly, i don't even watch it, never did, I didn't even see Janet's boob. But now because of timberlake's school boy antics we are getting the ugliest, oldest washed up rock stars they can throw at us! Just imagining accidental nudity makes me shiver. Paul McCartney last year. He's done! He had his hey day and now it's over. I thought, "Ok, obviously a safe choice" old, famous from the beatles, makes sense for the super bowl performance directly after the incident. But the A.J.B (after janet's boob) era has been less than pleasant. Now, announced last night.... we have the Rolling Stones. 5 of the ugliest, oldest, washed up rock stars ever to live. Again, they had their day, but come on! a half time show of "the classics" You are going to need some specatcular pyrotechnics to make up for the lack of appeal in singers/dancing. I mean Mick Jagger might break a friggin hip if he tries to pull out his old lindy-hop (ok he never did the lindy hop, but you get the picture)

So there you have it, our superbowl halftimes will continue to be washed-down, washed out, and ugly until someone decides the FCC isn't going to cut their balls off for putting a young (possibly good looking) singer on the stage. Why take the risk???